“The Earth’s temperature is getting hotter and hotter. The sea levels are rising. The ice sheets are shrinking,” the 43-year-old star quipped in the video. “I’m not a scientist, but I do believe everyone can use their skill set to do their part.

“That’s why I’m introducing a brand new bra with a built in nipple, so no matter how hot it is, you’ll always look cold,” she said, while showing off her chest complete with steadfastly hard nipples.

“Some days are hard, but these nipples are harder. And unlike the icebergs, these aren’t going anywhere.”

Kardashian joked about melting glaciers in her “nipple bra” advertisement.

Kardashian has promoted the bra with promises that 10% of its proceeds will go toward One Percent for the Planet, an organization which solicits businesses to donate 1% of their annual profits for environmental causes. But Greenpeace argued Kardashian’s brand was merely “co-opting” the climate crisis to sell lingerie.

“Kim is co-opting the language of climate activists to promote a plastic product made from petrochemicals,” the group wrote, adding the promise to donate proceeds was “alarmingly vague.

“This is an obvious case of greenwashing,” the group added, referring to the dishonest business practice of using dishonest environmental claims about a product to market it.

“We desperately need global icons like Kim to champion the fight against climate change,” Greenpeace said. “Kim’s new advert perpetuates the harmful profit-driven system accelerating the climate crisis, and diverts attention away from more impactful actions.”

Greenpeace said Kardashian marginilized the climate crisis in her ad.

Kardashian has previously used her platform to promote awareness of climate change, but she and her famous family also have faced accusations of hypocrisy over their extensive private jet use, which produces hundreds of times more emissions than the average Americans does in an entire year.

Others joined Greenpeace’s outrage at Kardashian, with many pointing out the video’s sarcastic tone as being out of place with her claims about truly caring for the environment.