News

Murdered in cold blood while on their way to get pizza: Final moments of two best friends before they were hunted down by machete gang in case of mistaken identity – as families pay tribute to pair who ‘wouldn’t hurt a fly’

Best friends Max Dixon and Mason Rist were on their way to buy pizza when they were senselessly ‘hunted down’ and murdered by a machete gang in a case of mistaken identity.

Forming a close bond from an early age, Max, 16, and Mason, 15, had grown up together. They went to the same nursery, junior and secondary school and spent their time chatting and gaming on the PlayStation.

January 27 was no different – the teenagers wanted to spend time together. CCTV shows Max calling round Mason’s house in Ilminster Avenue, Knowle, Bristol, at 11.13pm and the pair can be seen walking down the street to go and pick up a pizza.

Max’s mother, Leanne Ekland, was heading to bed and Mason’s mum, Nikki Knight, was enjoying a rare night out with friends.

Although they knew their sons were close, they were unaware that they were meeting up and going out for food.

But seconds after setting off, the young boys were chased and knifed to death in a horrific attack, just yards away from Mason’s front door after being wrongly identified as the culprits of an attack on a house that happened just an hour earlier.

Their heartbroken families today paid tribute to the ‘innocent’ pair who ‘wouldn’t hurt a fly’ – as they rejoiced at the attackers being brought to justice.

Anthony Snook, 45, Riley Tolliver, 18, and three teenagers aged 15, 16 and 17 – who cannot be named for legal reasons – were today convicted of the murders of Max and Mason.

Max and Mason suffered ‘unsurvivable’ stab wounds and died in hospital, while the murderers drove off in their car before burning their clothing in an attempt to cover their tracks.

Leanne Ekland, Max’s mother, said her son and Mason had known each other since nursery school.

‘The last six weeks have been emotionally draining,’ she said. ‘Today’s outcome doesn’t change the fact that two families go home without their boys.

‘We can now hopefully begin to process that and remember them both and the happy memories that both families have of Max and Mason.

‘I need to thank everyone that’s been involved in our case. I have so much respect for the hard work, dedication and support for our families.

‘There are no words to express how thankful I am to everyone. I will be forever grateful to them.

‘I wish we didn’t have to be here today, but we’ve got some sort of justice for our boys.’

In a statement released after the verdicts, Mason’s family said: ‘Our family is like a jigsaw puzzle and, with the loss of Mason, it is like a part of our jigsaw is gone forever and will never be complete.

‘Mason was a quiet boy who would never hurt a fly. He was just so lovely and innocent.

‘It is impossible to put into words how we feel. This whole process has been incredibly hard and hearing what we have heard, what happened to him, it is horrible to think about Mason’s last moments.

On the evening of January 27 2024, Mason Rist, 15, and Max Dixon, 16, were attacked and killed in the Knowle West area of Bristol.

Here is a timeline of the attack:

– Saturday January 27, 2024

10:07pm: Three men armed with machetes throw bricks at the windows of a property in Hartcliffe, injuring a woman. The attack is captured on CCTV.

10:48pm: Antony Snook, 45, and a 16-year-old return to Hartcliffe from Swindon in Snook’s Audi Q2. They had bought a mobile phone.

10:57pm: Snook, the 16-year-old and a 17-year-old leave the Hartcliffe property in Snook’s car. They pick up a 15-year-old and Riley Tolliver, 18, from a nearby street. Three are armed with machetes while Tolliver has a baseball bat. They head to the rival Knowle West district.

11:13pm: The Audi arrives in Ilminster Avenue, Knowle West.

11:13pm: Max calls round to his friend Mason’s home in Ilminster Avenue. They leave the property almost immediately. Within seconds the Audi drives past the friends, turns around, and heads back towards them.

11:14pm: The Audi stops and the four armed teenagers get out and chase after Max and Mason. The attack on the two boys lasts just 33 seconds. The car then leaves the scene. The 15-year-old and Tolliver are dropped off.

11:21pm: Snook and the 16 and 17-year-old return to the Hartcliffe property. Within minutes items of clothing are being burned in the back garden.

11:29pm: Snook arrives back at his home address on Dowling Road.

– Sunday January 28

0:12am: Mason arrives at Bristol Children’s Hospital.

0:15am: Snook is arrested at his home address.

0:33am: Max arrives at Southmead Hospital.

0:49am: Mason is declared dead.

1:02am: Max is declared dead.

1:08am: The 16 and 17-year-old travel to a block of flats in a taxi. They arrive 15 minutes later.

5:07am: The 16-year-old leaves the flat.

5:22am: The 16-year-old returns carrying McDonald’s takeaway and drinks.

‘These dangerous individuals took away our son, brother, nephew, uncle and grandchild and we must now navigate the rest of our lives without our missing puzzle piece.

‘From the bottom of our hearts, we want to thank everyone worked so hard on this case.

‘The investigation team for being so hard working and dedicated, we appreciate it wasn’t easy working endless hours and under pressure but it is because of you we got this result.

‘The family wouldn’t have been able to get through this unbearable time without having the best family liaison officers assigned to us.

‘They have gone above and beyond to ensure we are always updated, guided and supported throughout this awful process.’

The defendants sat impassively and stared straight ahead as the verdicts were delivered, while the victims’ relatives in the public gallery cried as the guilty verdicts were gives. Others cheered and punched the air.

After Max and Mason left the property in Ilminster Avenue, they were ‘hunted down’ within seconds and stabbed to death in a case of mistaken identity.

CCTV footage shown to the jury captured the gang of five men getting out of a car holding machetes before setting on the fleeing teenagers in a frenzied attack lasting just 33 seconds.

In footage of officers arresting Tolliver at his home, he is heard asking if he can have a ‘puff’ on his ‘blue razz cherry’ vape before being taken away.

Tolliver says: ‘Can I have a go on my puff before I go though. It’s a puff… Can’t I? It’s just blue razz cherry. Nicotine.’

Officers refuse, explaining that they don’t want to ’cause issues’ and there could be ‘cannabis in it which could affect your ability to be interviewed’.

Tolliver is also heard asking if he can ‘stand up’ and whether officers can loosen his cuffs.

At another point, he gives police permission to tell his grandmother why he has been arrested.

The two boys had been wrongly identified as being responsible for bricks being thrown at a house in the rival Hartcliffe district at 10.07pm that evening.

Around 50 minutes later, Snook left the property with two of the boys and picked up the other two in a nearby street before heading to Knowle West.

The Audi Q2 was driven around Knowle West for at least 12 minutes before the attack, the jury was told.

Snook drove down Ilminster Avenue and when they saw Mason and Max in the street they wrongly believed they had spotted those responsible for the attack.

Ray Tully KC, prosecuting, told the jury: ‘They were entirely wrong about that. Max and Mason had absolutely nothing to do with any earlier incident and no connection whatsoever with those events.’

Tolliver, who had a baseball bat, and the three teenagers armed with machetes jumped out of the car and chased after the two boys.

Max and Mason are seen going to different sides of the street, each pursued by two people from the vehicle.

Tolliver and the 15-year-old boy attacked Mason, while the 16-year-old boy and 17-year-old boy chased Max.

The 17-year-old boy also struck Mason, who was lying injured on the ground, as he headed back to the Audi after attacking Max.

A CCTV camera on Mason’s nearby house captured how the attack lasted just 33 seconds from the car pulling up to the teenagers getting back in and leaving.

Mason and Max sustained fatal stab injuries, and both died in hospital in the early hours of January 28.

Snook drove the teenagers from the scene and dropped them off in Knowle West.

A fire was lit in a back garden and items linked to the attack disposed of.

Meanwhile, the 16-year-old boy picked up a McDonald’s meal and drinks just six hours after the attack.

Giving evidence, Snook claimed he thought he was driving the teenagers in his Audi Q2 disability car to a ‘safe house’ after the attack on the Hartcliffe property.

When he was told to stop in Ilminster Avenue he believed they were outside the safe house, Snook alleged.

The landscape gardener, who lost a leg in a road accident, insisted he did not know the boys were carrying weapons and was looking in his rear view mirror at the time Max and Mason were attacked.

‘I thought they had got into a fight or something. I didn’t want to be involved with it. I didn’t think it was something that cost two people their lives,’ he said.

‘I just thought it was something stupid between Hartcliffe and Knowle that I had been dragged into. I didn’t realise anyone had been seriously hurt.’

The four teenagers did not give evidence during the trial.

But the jury was told the 16-year-old had been covertly recorded in custody saying he had heard Mason screaming during the attack and ‘had to sort of join in’.

He also said he had put on ‘loads more tracksuits’ and left his phone behind before heading to Knowle West.

In closing speeches to the jury, barristers representing the teenagers said there was no joint plan to attack the two boys.

Anna Vigars KC, representing the 16-year-old, suggested her client did not have any intention to kill or cause really serious harm to Max or Mason.

‘He didn’t spring into action – he gets left behind. He didn’t know what the plan was, if there was a plan,’ Mrs Vigars said.

‘It isn’t just that his heart was not in it, but his intention was not either.’

Christopher Quinlan KC, representing the 17-year-old, said his client had admitted the manslaughter of Max but denied inflicting any injury to Mason.

The jury were shown the CCTV footage of Mason, after being struck by the 15-year-old, getting to his feet, with prosecutors then alleging the 17-year-old inflicted a second blow to him.

But Mr Quinlan suggested an alternative, telling jurors: ‘He had managed to get to his feet but because of the injury he sustained he wasn’t able to stand, as the 17-year-old passes him.

‘We say when you divorce Mason’s movements from the 17-year-old then the evidence is not there that he did stab him or make contact with him.’

Ignatius Hughes KC, representing Riley Tolliver, said his client had not struck Mason with a ‘sword, machete or zombie knife’.

‘A baseball bat is a very different choice of weapon to go out with than a great big zombie knife,’ he said.

‘He had an opportunity to cause really serious injury to Mason, but he didn’t do it.’

Kate Brunner KC, representing the 15-year-old, said he was not involved in the fatal attack on Max because it happened at the same time he was murdering Mason.

‘He has told you the terrible thing that he did. He was 14 when he stabbed Mason,’ she added.

‘He says that he did that, he’s been honest with this court and with you by saying guilty.’

Mason’s uncle David Knight added: ‘We would like to say a massive thank you to Detective Superintendent Gary Haskins and all his team.

‘They promised us right at the beginning that they would do everything in their power and they have. They’ve got them.

‘We would like to thank the jury for having to see what we’ve seen, and no-one should ever see any of that.

‘We want to thank them for coming to the correct decision.’

Speaking after the verdicts, Detective Superintendent Gary Haskins, senior investigating officer at Avon and Somerset Police, said Max and Mason had been going for a pizza when they were fatally attacked in a case of mistaken identity.

‘They are beautiful boys, going about their business, in their own community when they were senselessly attacked by the individuals for no reason,’ he told the PA news agency.

‘What we know is that they passed Max when he was walking towards Mason’s house. Then Mason walks out of his house and joins Max.

‘The vehicle is passing, they think ‘that’s them, they will do’. They were hunting around Knowle to find people.

‘We know they had driven around Knowle two and a half times before they came across these two boys.’

Snook will be sentenced on November 19 at Bristol Crown Court.

The other four defendants will be sentenced on December 16 following the preparation of pre-sentence reports.

Trial judge Mrs Justice May thanked the jury for their work over the last five weeks.

‘Jury service is probably the most important public service you are asked to make,’ she said.

‘Some cases are particularly demanding on a jury and we are all aware this has been one of those.’

Vicky Cook, chief crown prosecutor for CPS South West, said: ‘The deaths of Max and Mason sent shockwaves through their community and the city of Bristol.

‘The Crown Prosecution Service worked closely with our colleagues in the Avon and Somerset major crime investigation team to build our case.

‘This was that all five defendants were jointly responsible for the murders of both Max and Mason.

‘Regardless of which individuals caused any of the fatal injuries, the evidence shows that all five were working together and share joint responsibility for this terrible crime.

‘The four youths armed themselves and went hunting for people to attack. When they came across Max and Mason, they launched a brutal, joint attack that left both boys fatally injured.

‘Antony Snook drove the youths around while they looked for people to attack. He knew that they were heavily armed and out for revenge. He could have been in no doubt about what they intended to do.

‘Snook waited for the youths while they carried out their cowardly attack, then acted as their getaway driver, helping them to escape the scene.

‘Today’s verdicts serve as a reminder that the carrying of knives and other bladed weapons can only lead to tragedy.

‘The loss that has been suffered by the families of Max and Mason is simply unimaginable, and our thoughts remain with them.’

Related Posts

SNSで危険な写り込みは?「モザイクアプローチ」で住所特定 自宅の写真でも危険な“7つのポイント”【Nスタ解説】|TBS NEWS DIG

SNSに投稿する写真には、知らず知らずのうちに個人情報が含まれている可能性があります。特に、住所を特定されるリスクが高まるため、注意が必要です。専門家によると、電柱やマンホールの蓋など、背景に映り込んでいる情報から居住地を特定されることがあるといいます。特に、ランニングやペットとの散歩の様子をSNSにアップする際は、周囲の情報に気を配ることが重要です。 年末年始には、自宅を留守にする機会が増えるため、投稿の内容には特に注意が必要です。「モザイクアプローチ」と呼ばれる手法では、SNSに投稿された文章や画像から個人情報が収集され、悪用されるケースが報告されています。例えば、自撮り写真に映り込んだマンホールの識別番号や、タピオカドリンクの反射に映る風景から撮影場所を特定されることがあります。 また、自宅での撮影時には、レシートや処方薬の袋、ゴミ出しのカレンダーなど、細かな情報から居住地を特定される危険性があります。特に、宅配便の伝票などはバーコードから情報が読み取られることもあります。さらに、SNSでの文章投稿もリスクが潜んでおり、特定屋と呼ばれる個人が、投稿から情報を収集し、住所や電話番号を特定する行為が増加しています。 旅行の計画をSNSで発信することは避けるべきです。「今からハワイに行きます」といった投稿は、自宅にいないことを知らせる危険があります。安全のため、投稿のタイミングをずらすことが推奨されています。 このように、SNSの利用には慎重な配慮が求められます。自分自身や家族の安全を守るために、情報の取り扱いには十分注意しましょう。

ウソまみれの女殺人犯VS警察の執念!(前編)【ザ!世界仰天ニュース】

2007年1月19日、広島県福山市で発生した夫殺害の疑惑により、森島不(もりしまふ)が逮捕された。この事件は、警察の執念深い捜査と、森島の巧妙な嘘によって展開される。彼女は、夫が経営していた喫茶店で火災が発生し、その際に夫が死亡したとされるが、警察は彼女の証言に疑念を抱く。 火災が発生した当夜、森島は友人と食事をしていたと主張していたが、実際には彼女の行動に矛盾が多かった。夫が亡くなった時刻と、彼女が友人と会っていた時間の整合性が取れず、さらには夫に多額の生命保険をかけていたことが明らかになった。保険は、夫が亡くなるわずか8日前にかけられており、結婚直後のタイミングであった。 警察の捜査が進むにつれ、森島の周囲には他の男の影も見え隠れする。その男は、森島が喫茶店でアルバイトしていた際の交際相手であり、彼女は夫が亡くなった後もそのカードを使い続けていたことが判明した。これは、彼女が夫の生命を奪った理由を裏付ける新たな疑惑を呼び起こす。 また、火災の数日後に夫の携帯電話が使用されていたことも発覚し、夫の死後も彼の名義を利用していた可能性が浮上している。警察は、森島が夫の死に関与している証拠を固めるため、周囲の証言を集め、詳細な調査を進めている。 この事件は、真実と嘘が交錯する中で、森島の運命がどう転がるのか注目される。果たして彼女は自らの罪を認め、警察の執念に屈するのか、それとも更なる嘘で逃れようとするのか。今後の展開に目が離せない。

南太平洋のバヌアツ沖でM7.3の地震 日本人の被害確認されず(2024年12月17日)

南太平洋のバヌアツ諸島で規模の大きな地震が発生しました。日本人の被害は確認されていません。 アメリカ地質調査所によりますと、17日、バヌアツ諸島の首都ポートビラの沖合を震源とする地震が発生しました。 震源の深さは57キロ、地震の規模を示すマグニチュードは7.3と推定され、ロイター通信は少なくとも1人が死亡したと報じています。 外務省によりますと、現地では建物が倒壊するなどしましたが、日本大使館や日本人への被害は今のところ確認されていないということです。 気象庁は現地で最大25センチの津波を観測した一方、日本への津波の影響はないとしています。 また、オーストラリア当局とフィリピン当局も、それぞれ「この地震による津波の恐れはない」と発表しています。

【速報】大阪市生野区で火事 消防車など37台が出動し消火活動中

大阪市消防によりますと17日午後3時ごろ大阪市生野区で火事が発生しているということです。 建物の1階2階部分約200平方メートルが燃えているとのことですが、けが人や逃げ遅れについてはまだわかっていません。 消防車など37台が出動し消火活動中だということです。

アパート火災で爆発音 男性死亡 神奈川・横須賀市【スーパーJチャンネル】(2024年12月17日)

神奈川県横須賀市の市営アパートで火事があり、火元の部屋の男性が死亡しました。 17日午前6時半ごろ、横須賀市の市営アパートの一室で爆発音を伴う火事がありました。 警察などによりますと、火は約2時間半後に消し止められましたが、この部屋に住む坂本秋満さんが死亡しました。 警察は出火の原因を調べています。

【追悼】中山美穂さんの“育ての親”が明かす「デビュー当時の約束」と、共演の中野英雄が明かす“忘れられない素顔”

「ありがとう、美穂。本当に頑張ったね……」 12月12日、都内で行われた中山美穂さんの葬儀に参列した“育ての親”は、そう別れを告げたという。 中山さんは12月6日、都内の自宅で亡くなった。54歳で急逝した元トップアイドルの訃報に、悲しみの声があふれた。所属事務所の発表によると、死因は入浴中の不慮の事故。事件性はないとされる。 「葬儀では、もう涙が止まらなくて。人生で一番泣いたんじゃないかってぐらい。私は独身ですし、美穂は娘のような存在でした。2人で芸能事務所を立ち上げて、人生の半分は一緒にいたんですから」 冒頭に続けてそう語るのは、中山さんの所属していた芸能事務所『ビッグアップル』の創業者・山中則男氏。中山さんを発掘し、世に送り出した人物だ。 1982年、中山さんの人生は、山中氏との出会いによって動き出す。 「私が東京の原宿でスカウトし、その後に母親と3人で食事をしたときのことです。美穂は“お母さんは、すっごく苦労してきたの。だからね私、頑張って、頑張って、お母さんに家を建ててあげたいの”と、涙を流しながら言うんです。その言葉を聞き、私は新たに自分が代表の事務所を立ち上げることを決めました」(山中氏、以下同) オーディションで軒並み落選するも 1980年代は、毎年のように数多のアイドルがデビューしていた。中森明菜や小泉今日子のように輝けるのは、ほんのひと握り。 「私が新しく事務所を立ち上げると言ったら、周囲は“何を考えているんだ、おまえはばかか”と、散々言われました。でも、私は絶対に売れると信じていたんです」 オーディションは軒並み落選。多くのレコード会社も興味を示さなかった。だが、中山さんに可能性を見いだした人物がいた。レコード会社『キングレコード』で音楽ディレクターだった福住朗氏だ。福住氏が話す。 「第一印象は、目力がすごい子だなって思いました。無口でしたが、この子には何かありそうだと思って、デモテープを録ることにしたんです」 中山さんは、中森明菜の『スローモーション』を選んで歌い、福住氏は、その姿に圧倒されたという。 「とにかく歌っている表情が素晴らしくよかった。声に透明感があり、言葉がすごくキレイに聞こえたんです。まだレッスンとかやっているわけじゃないのに、いい感じだなって。なにより発散する圧力が違う。人は、それをオーラと呼ぶのでしょうが、美穂さんは、それがすごく強い人でした」(福住氏、以下同) 魅了された福住氏は、社内で中山さんを猛烈にプッシュしたが反対される。 「キングレコードは、アイドルというジャンルに経験がなかった。先輩スタッフからは“やめておいたほうがいい、考え直せ”と、かなり反対されました。けれど、若造だった私は余計に燃えて(笑)」 デビュー前に「私、頑張りますから」 1989年、『VirginEyes』を熱唱する中山美穂さん 多くが、その可能性を否定したが、事態は一変する。1985年、中山さんの女優デビュー作となったTBS系ドラマ『毎度おさわがせします』の第1話が放送された翌日のことだった。 「さまざまな出演オファーが届き、電話が鳴りやまないんです」(前出・山中氏) 周囲から否定されても、それを支えてくれる多くの大人がいた。そんな後押しを感じていたのか、中山さんは懸命に走り続けたという。 キングレコードで中山さんの宣伝担当をしていた竹中善郎氏は当時、彼女が語った言葉が忘れられないでいる。 「デビュー前に“私、頑張りますから”って、私の目を真っすぐ見て言ったんです。その言葉どおり、美穂さんは本当にひたむきなんですよ。なんでも一生懸命やる。どんなに忙しくても弱音を吐かないし、熱が出ても休まない。口数の少ない子だから、自分から頑張っているなんて言わないけれど、伝わってくる。私も含め、みんなそういう彼女の姿に惹かれていきました」 ドラマ『毎度―』が放送された1985年の大みそか、日本レコード大賞の最優秀新人賞を受賞。15歳だった中山さんは涙を流して喜んだが、その夜に異変があった。 「授賞式の後、祝賀会があったのですが、美穂は30分ぐらいで“もう疲れたから帰りたい”と言う。大人の集まりですから、退屈なのだろうと思ったのですが……」(前出・山中氏、以下同) そうではなかった。中山さんが向かったのは、所属事務所。そこに大勢のファンが詰めかけていた。 「美穂は事務所にファンが集まるのを知っていたんです。だから、一刻も早くそこに行きたかった。彼女は一晩中、ファンの子たちと話していました。誰とでも分け隔てなく接する。それが彼女の魅力なんです」 その後、中山さんはトップアイドルへと駆け上がるが、その人柄は変わらなかった。…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *